Most of the following have been provided a complimentary DISCLOSURE DVD featuring the sworn testimony of the most eminently credible witnesses. At the time of posting this update all have refused the simple courtesy of a reply.
So much then for our fearless political leaders, science advisors and truth-seeking media sleuths. The alarming fact is that Australia has no fourth estate, genuine free press or unfettered electronic media. Accordingly these people are hereafter enshrined in professional hypocrisy. We do however thank ABC Radio National for extending the courtesy of an iniial response to our correspondence. However this abruptly halted upon reciept of the DVD witness testimony.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our organisation deeply regrets your ongoing refusal to respond to repeat correspondence. While recognising your right to disagree or perhaps challenge our presented evidence we do not believe our respectfully submitted requests for comment are deserving of your contempt.
Please note that this entirely reprehensible position extends beyond our organisation and slurs the courageous individuals to have come forward and provided sworn testimony. These eminently credible people include astronauts, test pilots, civil-commercial & military aviators, generals & high-ranking officers, corporate executives, civil and military air-traffic and radar controllers, distinguished police officers plus individuals from every single strand of military intelligence. Your position also gravely dishonours the memory of heroic astronaut the late Gordon Cooper.
Most of you were presented with a complimentary Disclosure DVD documentary for which in return we respectfully requested comment. Regrettably not one of you has offered passing opinion in disregard of the overwhelmingly abundant evidence borne out by witness testimony.
This constitutes the saddest possible reflection of our nation's political leadership, foremost science personnel and prominent media investigators. If any one of you knew how deeply offensive the current policy of ridicule is to the great many people who have endured a lifetime of being involved with something terrifying beyond belief, you might rethink your unfeeling response.
Having tolerated institutionalised ignorance all my life it was hoped the excess of 60-years of corroborated evidence borne out by confirmed witness testimony might bring some small measure of enlightenment. Sadly this self-imposed political dogma mired in scientific myopia and journalistic cowardice determines these hopes unfounded.
However acceptance of our claims is not the foremost issue. More important is the corruption of constitutional government through the illegal secrecy shrouding pollution free energy systems technology. Clearly none of you care enough about the environment or global warming to take the simplest action.
Accordingly we are forthwith registering concern with the high court of Australia. More recently we also wrote to the Govenor General who again has yet to respond.
It will be to your eternal shame that none of you have honoured the public trust invested in your respective offices, educational institutions and media positions to implement objective investigation in spite of our repeat requests demonstrably based upon established and easily verifiable evidence.
We conclude with the observation that evil can only flourish when decent people stand by and do nothing. In this instance your collective inaction contributes to ongoing criminality. This, in all probability, is an indisposed contribution. The same cannot be said for your failure to safeguard constitutional government and the unforgivable betrayal of the public!
Yours truly,
Tony Lambert.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is to be recorded and posted soon.
Interview One.
Hello, my name is Tony Lambert welcoming you to our new presentation of lifting the veil. Our brand new program is dedicated to penetrating the secrecy and illegal cover up in regard to the global UFO phenomenon that conventional science, Australian political party leaders, science institutions and commentators and leading media personalities steadfastly refuse to address. We find this most alarming in the wake of 58-years of multitudinous evidence backed up by corroborated witness testimony. Here in the studio we have the host of Radio Bashfull's leading science program THE SCIENCE SHAM presenter Dodging Williams.
Hello, I'm Dodging Williams.
Welcome to the program Dodging. First may I ask what exactly it is about the global UFO phenomenon that conventional science is so afraid of?
Well for a start the entire concept simply doesn't fit with what we know and understand of the universe. I should also add that as the nation's leading science presenter I represent a very august body of men and women of letters with the most impressive credentials in the field of science. As a thoroughly distinguished group we convey the scientific community point of view and we don't like unqualified outsiders with no recognised SCIENCE SHAM credentials coming in and rocking the boat.
Yes we understand it must be uncomfortable having your ivy tower comfort-zone rocked by new evidence but surely it's the responsibility of science to examine all possibilities before rejecting issues out of hand.
Look, it's all very well for you to say that but you don't represent the scientific communities established viewpoint which as far as we are concerned is unassailable. In other words if we at the SCIENCE SHAM say something is a fact, then that is what the public and science institutions must and will accept.
But isn't that a betrayal of every fundamental principle of scientific investigation and enquiry?
Call it what you like the facts will forever be what we, the very august and blindly accepted scientific community speaking with absolute authority and overriding certainty, say they are! End of story.
But what about the evidence you've been repeatedly presented with from the disclosure project?
Well all this stuff is very much at the margins isn't it. I mean who in their right mind will believe a scruffy rabble of flying saucer nuts anyway.
With respect Dodging I think that unfortunate response is avoiding the issue. Isn't it fair to ask that 60-years of repeatedly corroborated evidential material backed up by the most compelling witness testimony should be objectively examined by conventional science?
Not really. As already indicated our fixed attitude to this remains just that, fixed and inflexible and it doesn't matter how many credible witnesses they put forward my show the SCIENCE SHAM will totally ignore them and therefore maintain the status quo. You have to understand precisely what's at stake here, the full implications of allowing these irresponsible flying saucer nuts a viewpoint that might influence public opinion. It would be disastrous.
Why would it be disastrous?
Well for a start my distinguished ivy tower colleagues and I would be made to look ridiculous having taken such a firm stand against all this nonsense. As already indicated we represent the established scientific community viewpoint and the public are comfortable with that. We simply can't have new revelations upsetting the applecart and ruining our reputations.
Isn't that putting your ego over and above the values of genuine science?
I don't think this issue with all its potential consequences can be that simplified. As I said before the preeminent people I interview on the SCIENCE SHAM are highly distinguished men and women of letters who can never be allowed to be seen as being wrong. It's unthinkable! In other words this goes beyond personal ego and becomes more a matter of national pride. You wouldn't want the nations leading science show to be exposed as propagandist would you?
I'm not sure the DISCLOSURE PROJECT would agree with your there Dodging. You are aware they have in excess of 500 witnesses. Furthermore they have expressed deep regret at conventional science's refusal to accept UFO reports in disregard of the massive and ever-growing body of evidence repeatedly confirming the reality of this global phenomenon. In fact they have repeatedly furnished federal government and political party leaders, science institutions and media commentators with the sworn testimony from the most credible witnesses. Alarmingly all steadfastly refuse to respond. Why is that?
Clearly the topic of UFO's, unexplainable implants and alleged abductions has gotten out of hand. It's up to those of us at the very forefront of science, my very august colleagues and distinguished researchers to put a stop to this nonsense once and for all.
Are you saying that it is acceptable to ignore verified evidence? Isn't that the same as the burning of books?
Well if you have to burn a few books to keep undesirable issues quiet I supposed you have to balance that against having my reputation and those of my many distinguished colleagues, men and women of letters you understand, impeccable credentials, completely ruined; then yes certainly the end justifies the means.
Wouldn't you agree that astronauts, test pilots, civil-commercial & military aviators, generals & high-ranking officers, civil and military air-traffic and radar controllers, countless police officers are not given to fanciful imaginings, pointless hoaxing or outright lies? It is difficult to imagine a more eminently reliable and trustworthy witness pool. I mean their utterly compelling evidence comprising ground / airborne radar, limitless photographs, visual sightings and countless reams of video footage of this calibre would be upheld in any international court of law. You realise of course it requires the testimony of just three witnesses to convict an individual of murder. The DISCLOSURE PROJECT has in excess of 450 each stating they are willing to testify, under oath, before Congress or Parliament as to the truth of their testimony.
And a fat lot of good it will do them! Without the backing of such august radio programs like the SCIENCE SHAM they're pissing into the wind aren't they.
With respect Dodging we believe it is the duty of science in general to objectively examine all types of phenomenon not yet fully understood, and your attitude of outright dismissal can only be compared to what the Vatican did to Galileo.
Yes well that's what you can do when you have the power. The establishment burnt Giordano Bruno at the stake and accomplished pretty much the same thing with Wilhelm Reich. Ha ha, we even had his books burned by United States Federal court order before killing him off in solitary confinement in a federal penitentiary, so it's unwise to underestimate what the establishment can and will do.
And you are prepared to go to these extremes rather than admit you might just possibly be wrong? That your picture of the universe and all its workings might be incomplete?
There you go oversimplifying the issue once again. I mean it's just not that simple aside from which I've spent my entire distinguished career interviewing august men and women of letters who have agreed with me on all occasions that this UFO and crop circle stuff is utter bilge. You can't realistically expect me to do an about face now can you?
Well actually yes, although from what you indicate here this is not likely to happen anytime soon is it?
Not of course it won't, and if you know what's good for you you'll pull your head in too mate!
Well thank you Dodging Williams.
Right! I'm Dodging Williams. Goodbye!
